Author: pavel
Date: 04:33:22 10/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 09, 2000 at 07:09:22, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On October 09, 2000 at 04:46:01, pavel wrote: > >>lets not even go to fritz6a, just yet... >> >>IMO gandalf 4.32f is not even 'better' than the, >>"best -freeware- winboard engine" > >Yes. It is. dun forget IMO... > >>I can kick myself for buying it only by listening to the reviews of >>beta-testers.. :( $30 bucks down the drain. >> >>I would certainly not recommend anyone to buy it, well, if you want to collect >>chess program than thats something else. >> >>it gets completely smacked-down by nimzo2000b, and top programs like crafty and >>yace under winboard. > >That's a result limited to your machine, judging from results against posted by >Christian Koch and Frank Quisinsky. Not to mention my own experiences. I agree those are results limited to my machine... so whats your opinion about gandalf playing strength? ...lets here it from you. :) > >>_I_would rate it atleast 50elo less than crafty-yace (assuming they are in same >>level). > >It isn't and they're not. IMO, IMO, IMO, IMO , IMO.......... > >>as jauni said its not a blitz player....TRUE, also its not a standard time >>control player either :( (to the top level) (...) > >The small test you posted doesn't really give you any basis for speculation in >that regard. Rather pathetic IMHO. > >Mogens. hmmm, arent you the the one who posted in winboard forum, results of few games by program X, against other programs and went in to conclusion that "this" engine is better (or worse) than "that" engine? Now its rich coming from you of not havng enough games? DUH!! yes there is not enough games, and also sometimes you have to go through the games, not just, "play the games, see the results and jump in to conclusions" yes I am pathetic, my speculations are pathetic "you are god" (always right) :) Pavel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.