Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 03:47:12 12/26/97
Go up one level in this thread
On December 25, 1997 at 23:01:02, Fernando Villegas wrote: >Wait a second: why some people give so total importance to deep lines >and to be capable of looking deeper lines? You get me wrong Fernando. I am not interested in a program that has deep main lines. I watch junior and it's games. I study them. I ask myself: Why is it winning the championship. What is typical in it. When I look into Junior's games I see that there is almost no tactical blunder and Junior is almost never in danger to lose the game. There are some positional minor weaknesses, but all in all it is able to come out of the problem. So, I see overprotection and safety-first-algorithms (always a knight goes back on the first-rank to save the king or to save the structure). Than I watch the screen and see huge main-lines. But : The main lines work. They are not pure bullshit. If the opponent plays (would play) accurate, they would mainly work. This is the problem. I don't know why you now all try to underestimate what happens. I am not constructing a new theory. I am in the stage of collecting data. The construction of a theory out of it comes when I have junior myself. So you are to fast. You shoot without having junior yourself. Wait...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.