Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: rebel-tiger

Author: Christophe Theron

Date: 10:46:36 10/15/00

Go up one level in this thread


On October 15, 2000 at 03:22:50, Jason Williamson wrote:

>On October 14, 2000 at 03:08:12, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>On October 13, 2000 at 21:06:41, Jason Williamson wrote:
>>
>>>On October 13, 2000 at 08:24:22, Peter Skinner wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>Tiger does not use tablebases.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>Which helped Yace save a few lost endings against Gambit Tiger on the ICC :)))
>>>>>
>>>>>JW
>>>>
>>>>I have actually never seen Tiger or Gambit Tiger draw an ending that it was up
>>>>in score.
>>>>
>>>>I also have noted several times on this board, that the engines like Tiger that
>>>>don't use tb's are my favorite. Knowledge is power.
>>>
>>>In one case, Rebel had something like +6 or more, but it was a tricky Q ending,
>>>Rebel transposed into a drawn QP+Q ending if I recall.  Actually, knowledge is
>>>great, and tablebases are not a good excuse for having bad endgame play.  But on
>>>the other hand, it is so easy to do tablebase coding now, there really isn't any
>>>excuse not to include it.
>>>
>>>JW
>>
>>
>>
>>It was tablebases or Gambit Tiger.
>>
>>I have chosen to work on Gambit Tiger.
>>
>>So yes, I have a really good excuse.
>>
>>
>>
>>    Christophe
>
>
>Ok, I didn't mean it to be insulting.  :)


No problem. It's just that I have been working very hard these past weeks, so I
was a little bit irritated by the "no excuse" comment. :)

I should take some rest now. I'm getting a little bit unpleasant. :)

Sorry.



>  From the 2nd hand info we are
>getting, it sounds like you have another potential #1 on the SDDF list.  Mainly,
>I was just commenting that rebel lost a few half points to Yace the other day
>due to its lack of TB.


I have fixed a number of such problems in the endgame by adding specific
knowledge.

I like the idea that my program can play the endgame on its own without relying
on 2Gb+ databases clobbering the hard disk.

Anyway, when I implement TBs, it will bring a nice 20-30 elo improvements. Given
that most of my opponents have already TBs, that means that I'm going to steal
this amount of elo points from them and they will not get them back. :)



    Christophe



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.