Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Gambit tiger

Author: Bas Hamstra

Date: 05:10:06 10/17/00

Go up one level in this thread


On October 17, 2000 at 06:14:57, Thorsten Czub wrote:

>On October 17, 2000 at 04:44:58, Bas Hamstra wrote:
>>However I was not impressed by several Gambit Tiger games at FICS against my
>>program, on equal hardware. When it's boring of course both are to blame, but
>>the point is it doesn't blow you off the board like TheKing or CSTal can do. It
>>is supposed to be in a different league, not to just play on until the opponent
>>dies of age. Maybe the final version is different from the FICS beta.
>>
>>
>>Regards,
>>Bas.
>
>i wonder why you not wonder that what you see on FICS gives you a wrong
>impression.
>
>There you are playing fast blitz games , right ?!

All sorts of tc's. I play 10/0 30/0 60/0 and 120/0. Not all blitz, I would say.

>how shall this give you an idea ?
>blitz is shit for measuring something.
>if you are not impressed yet, this only shows how senseless blitz-games
>are for measuring anything.

Yep, but the games against Tiger were mostly 30/0 and 60/0 if I am not mistaken.
That's not exactly Blitz.


Regards,
Bas.









This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.