Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Kasparov vs Kramnik playing an open game of chess is exciting, But ?!

Author: Jorge Pichard

Date: 06:23:10 10/18/00

Go up one level in this thread


On October 18, 2000 at 09:16:23, Jorge Pichard wrote:

>On October 17, 2000 at 22:44:02, James Robertson wrote:
>
>>On October 17, 2000 at 19:37:32, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>
>>>When two humans play an open game of chess specially for the World's
>>>Title it is very exciting to watch. We have not seen too many of these open
>>>games played since the era of Bobby fischer, which is probably the reason why
>>>his games were full of fire. But if any of these two gladiators dare to play an
>>>open game against any of the top leading programs such as Fritz and Chess Tiger
>>>they would not have a chance to defeat these tactical monsters.
>>>The only way to beat the best P.C chess programs is by playing the way that
>>>Kramnik played against Deep Junior with opening like the Stone wall Defense, and
>>>once P.C chess programs are programmed to handle closed openings like the Stone
>>>Wall defense they will become unbeatable.
>>>
>>>Pichard.
>>
>>This is bogus. Shirov defeated 8xprocesser Fritz in an open G/25, even
>>sacrificing two exchanges to complete the job.
>>
>>James
>
>Peter Leko from Hungria is rated 2748 by Fide 2 points higher than Shirov, but
>lost to Deep Junior in srandard time control when he dared to play an open game
>against DJ. In game in G/25 is not such of an advantage for computer
>any longer, since the more time you provide the System the deeper they will also
>calculate and in an open game they will definitively outcalculate any Super GM.
>

PS: Now Computers are getting closer than ever to beat Super GM in any time
control, specially using 4 or 8 processors.
>Pichard.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.