Author: James T. Walker
Date: 09:59:27 10/21/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 21, 2000 at 10:56:53, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 21, 2000 at 09:27:22, James T. Walker wrote: > >>On October 21, 2000 at 05:28:14, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>I composed this position to see if chessmaster can see perpetual check. >>> >>>[D]4k3/6RQ/6PP/8/r7/8/r7/7K b - - 0 1 >>> >>>The target is to see 0.00 score >>> >>>I found that chessmaster does not see the draw even after some minutes but after >>>Ra1+ Kg2 it can see the draw very quickly in clearly smaller depth. >>> >>>The same after Ra1+ Kh2 >>> >>>I tried also Fritz5.32 and it does not see the draw at least after a short time. >>> >>>If I give Fritz5.32 the moves Ra1+ Kg2 it can see the draw but after Ra1+ Kh2 >>>it has problems to see the draw. >>> >>>Fritz5.32 expects Kg2 when it plays Ra1+ and wants to play Kg2 at depth 13 with >>>evaluation 0.00. >>> >>>How many squares can the white king visit before the repetition?(it is clear >>>that the white king cannot visit all the 21 squares (b1-b3... h1-h3)) >>> >>>Uri >> >>Hello Uri, >>Why can't the White King visit all 21 squares? If the King takes the pattern of >>h2,g1,g2,f1,f2,e1,e2,d1,d2,c1,c2,b1,b2,b3,b2,c3,c2,d3,d2,e3,e2,f3,f2,g3,g2,h3,h2,h1,g2,f1,f2,e1,e2,d1,d2,c1,c2,b1, >>it has visited all 21 squares and taken 38 moves without hitting the same square >>3 times. What did I miss? >>Jim > >You missed the fact that computers are supposed to evaluated second repetition >in the search as a draw. > >Uri Hello Uri, I didn't know that. What is the reasoning behind that? There is a lot I don't know about computer chess! :-) Jim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.