Author: Harald Faber
Date: 02:58:36 10/23/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 23, 2000 at 03:44:14, Thorsten Czub wrote: >without any arrogance , i really guess that chris waits first until the others >in the scene get a little more intelligent concerning chess, and - if the scene >has found out that it needs chess to play chess, maybe he will come out ... >in the month before gambit-tiger and gandalf occured chris seemed pretty much >pissed-off by computerchess. sometimes you get frustrated and then you leave and >do something else. i think he was with his family or hang arround. >have no idea. > >people always think this is arrogance, when in fact it was boring for him. >he had no interest talking about bits and bytes. > >the gambit-tiger development brings of course a light into his dark life :-)) > >now somebody else proves that his ideas where not that wrong. > >funny - isn`t it ? The only funny thing is that you always write as if this playing style is Chris' own which he invented, as if it is not possible to get a program attack without "his" ideas. Do all attacking chess players follow Andersens or Morphys ideas? I don't think so. Every chess player who does not know of Morphy e.g. but likes to and plays attacking chess does not follow his "ideas". Get it? Attacking chess is not invented by Chris.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.