Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Junior's long lines: more data about this....

Author: Komputer Korner

Date: 16:04:26 12/31/97

Go up one level in this thread


I have the solution for one of your questions at least. At the start
position with opening books off, look at the score evaluation after a
good night's think.  If the evaluation isn't in the range of +0.12 to
+0.20, your evaluation is either skewed  asymmetrically or else the
evaluation function is out of whack. This is based on the fact that
White scores 56 % out of the total mass of games at the higher levels.
The 56 % is equivalent to a score of about 1/2  a tempo or  0.16 pawns.
If your program doesn't attain this score  ( adjusting for variance is
why I gave the range from 0.12 to 0.20) then there is indeed something
wrong.

On December 30, 1997 at 07:13:39, Chris Whittington wrote:

snipped
>This doesn't solve the problem of how to test for relatively neutral
>positions. Like the start position, e4, d4, nf3 and various other moves
>are perfectly acceptable, and the choice depends on a bunch of factors,
>importantly what type of chess game you like to play.
>
>How are you going to test for this or any other position where there's a
>'steering' choice ?
>
>Chris Whittington



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.