Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 13:34:08 11/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 2000 at 16:06:09, Joe Besogn wrote: >On November 08, 2000 at 15:26:11, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On November 08, 2000 at 12:32:17, Joe Besogn wrote: >><snipped> >>>I see no purpose in arguing with you, as Kuhn says, "They are so different that >>>argumentation between them is rendered impossible." >> >>I do not understand. >> >>You claim that you see no purpose in arguing with Bob hyatt but you do it again >>and again. >> >>Uri > >It's round and round in circles, talking through the other person, contradicting >not arguing. Pointless. There is no agreement even on what is important, no >agreement on anything at all. Different planets. > >I state my opinion, he states his. If he smears or tells lies, then I'll fight >him. Otherwise it's just my opinion. Since I don't tell lies, I suppose you are just happy? And since I don't 'smear' the same logic holds? A smear is an intentional false statement made to damage someone's reputation or character. I don't do those. Again, unless you consider my using your real name a smear, which doesn't make much sense IMHO.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.