Author: Harald Faber
Date: 22:02:55 11/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 09, 2000 at 22:56:47, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On November 09, 2000 at 06:27:24, Harald Faber wrote: > >>On November 08, 2000 at 11:48:06, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On November 08, 2000 at 01:59:24, Harald Faber wrote: >>> >>>>On November 07, 2000 at 09:48:43, Shanti wrote: >>>> >>>>>Hi >>>>> >>>>>Shredder 5 played 1 tournament and won (world championship) and it wasn't the >>>>>future release Shredder 5 but a beta version (Shredder 4 just won CCT2). >>>>> >>>>>Though GT is no weak program I think Shredder has proven itself to be a very >>>>>strong program winning tournaments consistently. >>>>> >>>>>Shanti >>>> >>>> >>>>No doubt, but that does not answer the question whether Shredder5 is the >>>>strongest program available. Although, referring to the author, Shr5 isn't >>>>available yet so it can't be the strongest prog available. :-) >>>>Even if it were, this one Championship does not prove it, not enough games. Even >>>>the two wins of Gambit Tiger in France and NL aren't enough. >>>>Concerning the way how Shredder5 won the WCh, just look how GT won the other two >>>>Chpships... >>>> >>> >>>Yes... but then look at the overall strength of all the opponents in all the >>>tournaments you are looking at. The WMCCC had a stronger field by a big margin. >> >>A stronger field but less games so a bigger margin of error. >> > >not exactly. 4 wmccc events is > 32 games. Far more than either of the other >two tournaments discussed. > Again: Shredder5 = London = *1* tournament. Tiger played *2* tourneys.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.