Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 22:39:07 11/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 11, 2000 at 21:30:55, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On November 11, 2000 at 18:36:22, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On November 11, 2000 at 18:22:44, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >>>wrong >> >>I remember that you were one of the people who proved that hiarcs has king >>safety problems by posting games that hiarcs7.32 lost against chess system tal >>by king attack. >> >>Uri > >Thorsten changes his opinion more frequently than the wind direction changes >at the North Pole. this is important if you want to combine all new data with the old data. hiarcs7.32 has not changed for a while why new programs have been on the market. in the moment it is not anymore state-of-the-art because others have come later. but at its own time, hiarcs7.32 was not that bad, the dos version was IMO better, but nevertheless, the program contained a lot of knowledge bob. mark always tried to bring much knowledge into the program. i liked this. on the other hand hiarcs always had the problem to come deeper. it was very optimized for longer-time-controls. the problem with hiarcs is imo as with cstal: the search would need a few state-of-the-art techniques to help the knowledge part of the program. if you never change your opinion when new data comes and time goes by, you will not be able to reevaluate reality and you will not change your opinion, bob. you have to recalibrate again and again. if not - you lose the feeling of what is real and stay in some old point of view about the world.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.