Author: Uri Blass
Date: 06:48:15 11/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2000 at 07:41:23, pavel wrote: >On November 14, 2000 at 07:35:01, Keith Kitson wrote: > >>I'm not sure Fritz is second best. >> >>We have the Rebel stable leading the field at present, then Shredder close >>behind then probably Chessbase! >> >>Does anyone else see it differently......:-)) >> >>Keith > >Oh! I almost forgot shredder5, >I guess since shredder5 is not as much tested as it's compititors (becoz of it's >high price), people dont talk about this program compare to others. > >shredder,junior,fritz,Chess Tiger (excluding all the version numbers) >are IMO in the same leage, the differance is probably nothing much to brag >about. > >pavs We need to wait and see results in order to know. We have not enough information at long time control so we cannot know if they are in the same league. Shredder5 "claims" to be 100 elo better than Fritz6a and wee need to wait and see the truth. Tiger13 and Gambittiger do not claim to be 100 elo better than Fritz6a. The results of chessfun on fast hardware suggest that they are 100 elo better but we need more games to know. The time control of chessfun games is 60 minutes per game+3 second per move but it is almost the same time control as the ssdf games if you consider the fact that the hardware of her is 900 mhz. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.