Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 11:35:40 11/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2000 at 14:17:27, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >I have and like Century 3, Gambit and Tiger, and I also like Deep Fritz and >Shredder 4.x and others. And-And-And. Why should it be and/or? Why is it >necessary for some to shoot at other programs in order to praise the oh so great >chosen one? Your viewpoint is very consistant with the one that I have on this subject. There's a lot of enjoyable programs, whether they be strong, weak, commercial or free, available for the open minded. Fixating your belief and devotion to a single program and proclaim it to be the chosen one is a very narrow minded approach IMHO. There's more than one program for everyone's taste if one care to look. >As for Fritz, doubting its competence either in its GUI or in its ability to >play strong chess is, in my opinion, on the verge of the grotesque. For other >opinions, one could check Anand's, for instance, who has been quite explicit. What did Anand say about Fritz? Mogens.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.