Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 17:44:38 11/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2000 at 20:27:21, Mogens Larsen wrote: >>let me guess: is chessfun a credible source ?? >She would be high on my list when it comes to credibility. But I wouldn't >consider her review of Rebel Tiger II, if she makes one, to be more significant >than yours regardless of content. i hope she makes one. I don't have your subjective/objective dualistic point of view. i KNOW all people are subjects. and that ALL opinion is far from beeing objective. but i like this. therefore i can read anything she e.g. writes and like it too. >>and ? which review of eds do you think is weak and which passage. >>please give an example. i don't have written any review so far myself. >>i want to make a review that fits to you. i know this is impossible, >>but i will try. so please show me which passages you DON'T like >>and criticize, that i understand you better. >I just want you to describe the functions implemented in Rebel Tiger II and >their strengths and weaknesses, ie. various features of GUI and how it >complements the engines. but isn't such a feature list very boring ? you can publish or print the handbook for those things, make the handbook public in internet, but this is not what i do expect from a review. i remember in old days of computerschach and spiele we had such a case. there was a guy who always quoted the handbook of dedicated chess computers. pages of feature lists. and no single game in the review. this was very boring and senseless IMO. i attacked him heavily. he stole the room for the chess related stuff. > Perhaps a comparison with other products on the market >would be a nice touch if you can be objective in your description. That >shouldn't be too difficult. aha. thank you. >It's not difficult to be objective if you explain what a product can or cannot >do. But there's also subjective impressions as well, which isn't a problem as >long as the person is independent of the product how do you know if somebody is independant ? how do you decide this ? which evidence makes you decide: he is independant ? this interests me. > and explains that it's his >opinions alone. A reviewer is a consumer too. At least in principle. right. >Whether you can buy the product or not is actually irrelevant since you're >involved in the development of the product. of course. and this is work too. >Neither do I. I can't stand eating anything that once had feathers :o). a good !
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.