Author: Uri Blass
Date: 04:56:36 11/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 16, 2000 at 07:47:48, Peter Skinner wrote: >On November 15, 2000 at 15:23:17, Christophe Theron wrote: > >>On November 15, 2000 at 09:52:03, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >> >>>This position is real from a game ( but not from Tiger ) ! >>> >>>8/8/8/6Np/2N5/Pk6/6K1/8 w - a3 0 1 >>> >>>In this position played a old version from Fritz 5 (Fritz-Nemeth) Ne5? >>>And the game was draw ! :) >>> >>>I give now this position Tiger 13.0 for test an Tiger 13.0 played Ne5 ? >>> >>>(With tablebases Tiger how about better) >>> >>>Eduard >> >> >> >>Thanks for pointing this out. I have recorded it in my to do list, and will fix >>it as soon as possible. >> >> >> >> Christophe > >I can get Tiger to find Nf4 within 2 mins with the regular book, and in 55 >seconds with the London book. I do not understand. 1)The book is not relevant because the position is an endgame 2)I do not know about the london book in tiger. Rebel 2.1 analysis engine finds Nf4 instantly. Why >the difference? Rebel has knowledge that tiger has not. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.