Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 09:51:02 11/17/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 16, 2000 at 20:34:10, John Stanback wrote: >On November 16, 2000 at 13:24:25, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >>On November 16, 2000 at 09:07:23, walter irvin wrote: >> >>>to me programs fall into 2 list bean counters and knowledge based . >>>bean counters >>>fritz >>>junior >>>nimzo >>>lg2000a >>> >>>knowledge based >>>shredder >>>hiarcs >>>rebel >>>tiger >>>diep >>>crafty >>>king >>> >>>now you would think that the knowledge based programs would destroy bean >>>counters .but that is usually not the case .bean counters are some of the best >>>and strongest .which makes me wonder if trying to put so much knowledge in a >>>program really makes it better .i think that depth of search would count for >>>more than knowledge . >> >>To me, they fall into two categories, A-M, and N-Z. I think that the balance of >>power has favored A-M (Genius, MChess, Fritz, Hiarcs), but over time we are >>seeing an increase in strength in N-Z (Shredder, Tiger, Nimzo). >> >>My personal favorites are mostly A-M programs, and my own program is definitely >>an A-M program (Ferret), but I do have a few sentimental favorites in the N-Z's >>(XXXX). >> >>The A-M's also include the top mainframe programs (Deep Blue, Hitech, Cray >>Blitz), and the best open-source program (Crafty), so all in all I think that >>A-M is still doing better than N-Z. >> >>bruce > > >I believe that the future of computer chess clearly lies >in the N-Z programs. In fact, I think the most strongly >N-Z will ultimately dominate.... :) > > >John Actually, I think that a "new paradigm" program from Greece will be the best in the world. (PS its name starts with "gamma", so it obviously doesn't belong in either of Bruce's two groups.) :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.