Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: A-M vs N-Z

Author: Bruce Moreland

Date: 19:44:29 11/18/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 17, 2000 at 16:58:44, Thorsten Czub wrote:

>On November 16, 2000 at 13:24:25, Bruce Moreland wrote:
>>To me, they fall into two categories, A-M, and N-Z.  I think that the balance of
>>power has favored A-M (Genius, MChess, Fritz, Hiarcs),
>
>sorry bruce, but you put fritz and mchess and hiarcs together in ONE group?
>
>fritz has as much to do with mchess and hiarcs like an
>eastern german trabi-car with a citroen xantia-activa.
>
>
>> but over time we are
>>seeing an increase in strength in N-Z (Shredder, Tiger, Nimzo).
>
>nimzo ?!?! together with shredder and tiger ? it seems you mixed the groups.
>
>aphabetical order makes sense for names in a telephone book, but for chess,
>the alphabetical order is not a good idea.

It's about as good as dividing them into "knowledge" and "speed" programs.

bruce




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.