Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: A-M vs N-Z

Author: Dave Gomboc

Date: 17:40:29 11/21/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 16, 2000 at 15:50:57, Dan Ellwein wrote:

>On November 16, 2000 at 14:43:19, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On November 16, 2000 at 14:39:50, Bertil Eklund wrote:
>>
>>>On November 16, 2000 at 14:28:14, Ritter Rost wrote:
>>>
>>>>On November 16, 2000 at 13:24:25, Bruce Moreland wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On November 16, 2000 at 09:07:23, walter irvin wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>to me programs fall into 2 list bean counters and knowledge based .
>>>>>>bean counters
>>>>>>fritz
>>>>>>junior
>>>>>>nimzo
>>>>>>lg2000a
>>>>>>
>>>>>>knowledge based
>>>>>>shredder
>>>>>>hiarcs
>>>>>>rebel
>>>>>>tiger
>>>>>>diep
>>>>>>crafty
>>>>>>king
>>>>>>
>>>>>>now you would think that the knowledge based programs would destroy bean
>>>>>>counters .but that is usually not the case .bean counters are some of the best
>>>>>>and strongest .which makes me wonder if trying to put so much knowledge in a
>>>>>>program really makes it better .i think that depth of search would count for
>>>>>>more than knowledge .
>>>>>
>>>>>To me, they fall into two categories, A-M, and N-Z.  I think that the balance of
>>>>>power has favored A-M (Genius, MChess, Fritz, Hiarcs), but over time we are
>>>>>seeing an increase in strength in N-Z (Shredder, Tiger, Nimzo).
>>>>>
>>>>>My personal favorites are mostly A-M programs, and my own program is definitely
>>>>>an A-M program (Ferret), but I do have a few sentimental favorites in the N-Z's
>>>>>(XXXX).
>>>>>
>>>>>The A-M's also include the top mainframe programs (Deep Blue, Hitech, Cray
>>>>>Blitz), and the best open-source program (Crafty), so all in all I think that
>>>>>A-M is still doing better than N-Z.
>>>>>
>>>>>bruce
>>>>
>>>>For me this is the post of the year.
>>>
>>>Agree
>>>
>>>Bertil
>>
>>
>>The only thing I couldn't figure out is which group is "new paradigm"???
>>
>>:)
>
>ahh... new paradigm would be the group N-P, of course...
>
>is that - new paradigm, no paradigm, or simply an anomaly...
>
>:)

That is an NP-complete question! ;)

Dave



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.