Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: The reason that gandalf is a good program for analysis

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 09:10:18 11/22/00


I found from my experience that Gandalf does not do preprocessing.

I asked the programmer about it to know if this is always the case(because I
suspected that maybe there are some rare cases when it is a preprocessor) and he
told me that Gandalf does not care about the root position.

I think that it is very good for analysis because I can generate a tree and use
the scores of the program to decide about the move when I cannot do it with
other programs because the score is not made from the same point of view.

I remember also that Amir claimed that Junior does a little bit of preprocessing
but he does not like it and thinks to change it

I am interested to know about the behaviour of other top programs.
I think that it is possible to divide top program by the reply to the question
if they do preprocessing.

I already know that Rebel and Tiger do preprocessing and I also know that
shredder5 is a preprocessor by my definition(I do not have it but I asked the
programmer about it and he told me that shredder5 is not a preprocessor by the
average definition of it but but there is some preprocessing done at the root).
I also know that crafty is a preprocessor(not by the average definition that I
do not know).

I am also interested to know what is the average definition.
My definition is that if there is some preprocessing done at the root then the
program is a preprocessor.

Uri



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.