Author: Chessfun
Date: 13:34:07 11/26/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 26, 2000 at 14:09:20, Peter Kappler wrote: >On November 26, 2000 at 13:34:17, Chessfun wrote: > >>On November 26, 2000 at 12:55:41, Bruce Moreland wrote: >> >>>On November 26, 2000 at 04:24:46, Severi Salminen wrote: >>> >>>>>>Not to offed, but you could have posted your three messages of same topic into >>>>>>same thread, not as three separate threads. These are not _that_ important >>>>>>announcements... >>>>>> >>>>>>Severi >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Is every message posted an important announcement?. >>>>>Who makes the determination....you? >>>> >>>>I don't get your point. Daniel posted 3 times something about his internet >>>>problems. I think he should have posted them to the same thread. It would have >>>>been easier to follow the progress of his problems. >>>> >>>>>He can post as many new threads as he sees fit some here >>>>>have expressed interest in watching his games and how he >>>>>decides to post is his choice. >>>> >>>>Well, just to inform you also, we have this thread system because we could >>>>follow certain topics easier. It has nothing to do with interest to his matches. >>>>It is the same if everybody wants to read them or nobody, it is just a matter of >>>>makeing things clearer. Maybe this place needs some basic rules as many still >>>>don't know simple basics of posting to a forum or NG... >>>> >>>>Severi >>> >>>You are right that he should have posted this to one thread, but you aren't >>>going to get a lot of support for the idea of "rules". >> >> >>Shoulda/woulda/coulda. There are no rules that state he should post >>to one thread. There are people who come here and post and have fun >>doing it. Daniel I think is one of them, to expect that he should follow >>more rules that don't even exist, after the recent blow-up over his headers >>is unfair. >> >>Sarah. > > >I don't think it's "unfair" to explain basic newsgroup etiquette to a poster, >especially when it's done politely, as Severi did. > >Maybe there is some history here that I don't understand, but I think it's >strange that you would take issue with such a simple request. > >--Peter Had he left it after the first sentence I would have had no problem with it. Sarah.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.