Author: Stuart Cracraft
Date: 13:33:07 01/15/98
Go up one level in this thread
Sorry I got a little pompous there but I've always wanted to use that phrase... :-) On January 15, 1998 at 16:26:14, Stuart Cracraft wrote: >On January 15, 1998 at 14:52:27, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >> >>On January 15, 1998 at 14:42:14, Stuart Cracraft wrote: >> >>>SEE - the static exchange evaluator can be used >>>to improve upon the usual capture search move >>>ordering or move selection. >>> >>>Option 1) >>>SEE is used instead of usual sort to order losing >>>capture sequences at the bottom of the list, equal >>>sequences above that, and winning sequences at >>>the top? >>> >>>Option 2) >>>Or, instead, should it be used to eliminate >>>losing capture sequences altogether from being >>>searched. >>> >>>Option 1a) >>>Use SEE as in option 1 but also in the full-width >>>search for sorting capture sequences >>> >>>Option 2) >>>Same as option 2 but also in full-width >>> >>>Are there other choises of how to use SEE? Which >>>have proven best? And what kind of a speedup do you >>>see for the various options? >> >>Try it and see. You can write a SEE, do the experiments, and report >>them. I'd be interested in seeing what the results are. >> >>bruce > >Bruce, > >Agree, agree, agree.. But not without first asking questions for past >research >and recommendations on the subject. > > "Stand on the shoulders of giants and > ye shall SEE. Pretend to be a giant and > ye shall be brought down." Anon. > >--Stuart
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.