Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Marcus Kastner versus Millennium (again)

Author: Dan Ellwein

Date: 12:11:27 12/06/00

Go up one level in this thread


On December 06, 2000 at 02:54:01, Ed Schröder wrote:

snip

>The purpose of my question is to estimate if there is some damage
>done to the good name of Rebel and Chess Tiger and if this is true
>defend myself and restore things if possible.

No damage done to the good name of Rebel and Chess Tiger from this end, Ed...

(at least as far as I am concerned)

Ed... you and Christophe have done a good job with Rebel Century and Rebel
Tiger...

Dan Ellwein

snip

>Ed
>
>
>===============================================================
>
>[Millennium]
>Christophe, it was not me who started spreading this information. Please read
>Marcus' magazine. I got all my information from there.
>
>
>[Christophe]
>I don't have the magazine, and I don't read german accurately enough. That's
>unfortunate, but if I ask somebody to send me the magazine and then find someone
>else to translate the article for me, it's going to take 2 weeks or more.
>
>[Millenium]
>This might be a good idea.
>
>
>[Ed]
>I don't think so and I will explain why.
>
>You decided to defend your case here in public.
>
>So post what the accusations against Marcus are.
>
>Quote the magazine and explain what Marcus did wrong in your opinion.
>
>Now confusion is all around, I haven't read ChessBits and the WCCCM
>article. It is even unclear to me why you are suing Marcus on what
>he wrote in his magazine.
>
>I understand you are not suing Marcus to have used his knowledge
>in favor of Rebel and Tiger in London as that was what I understand
>at first. Now you seem to deny that. But then what? I completely
>lost track.
>
>Please clarify or rest your case.
>
>Ed



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.