Author: Chris Taylor
Date: 12:14:02 12/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 06, 2000 at 07:14:11, Terry Ripple wrote: >On December 06, 2000 at 02:54:01, Ed Schröder wrote: > >>Sorry to bring this issue up again but I would appreciate some feedback. >> >>I don't know if this issue is considered off-topic but then for me it is >>very on-topic and I will explain why. >> >>Marcus Kastner recently posted here some info about his juridical fight >>with Millennium which was followed here by a defence of Millennium. >> >>Much to my dislike the good name of Rebel and Chess Tiger were used >>to fight the war between the 2 gentlemen. Email did not help and so >>the discussion went on and on forcing Christophe and me to react so >>now and then in order to keep things in balance. >> >>During all of this the implication was Rebel and Tiger had using so called >>"foreknowledge" via Marcus Kastner (the Tiger operator) against >>Shredder in London 2000 during the WCCC indirectly questioning the good >>results of Rebel and Tiger. >> >>Although Millennium stated "No Ed you did not cheat" the presentation >>felt different and I would like to know if some of you feel the same >>way. >> >>The purpose of my question is to estimate if there is some damage >>done to the good name of Rebel and Chess Tiger and if this is true >>defend myself and restore things if possible. >> >>And no, I am not going to sue. The worse thing that can happen I will >>write a public statement on my pages and that will be it. >> >>Another purpose of this posting is to avoid this whole unfortunate >>story will be presented in a wrong way in the chess press later. I >>mean the discussion here ended in a very unclear way while even I did >>not understand anymore what the point of Millennium was leaving not >>only me but also CCC in the dark. >> >>So some feedback is really appreciated as I don't like to be called a >>cheater indirectly. >> >>The discussion ended in the below confusing way and I take back my "or >>rest your case" in my last sentence as I think Millennium should have >>reacted on this, which I asked in email, but nothing was coming. >> >>Ed >> >> >>=============================================================== >> >>[Millennium] >>Christophe, it was not me who started spreading this information. Please read >>Marcus' magazine. I got all my information from there. >> >> >>[Christophe] >>I don't have the magazine, and I don't read german accurately enough. That's >>unfortunate, but if I ask somebody to send me the magazine and then find someone >>else to translate the article for me, it's going to take 2 weeks or more. >> >>[Millenium] >>This might be a good idea. >> >> >>[Ed] >>I don't think so and I will explain why. >> >>You decided to defend your case here in public. >> >>So post what the accusations against Marcus are. >> >>Quote the magazine and explain what Marcus did wrong in your opinion. >> >>Now confusion is all around, I haven't read ChessBits and the WCCCM >>article. It is even unclear to me why you are suing Marcus on what >>he wrote in his magazine. >> >>I understand you are not suing Marcus to have used his knowledge >>in favor of Rebel and Tiger in London as that was what I understand >>at first. Now you seem to deny that. But then what? I completely >>lost track. >> >>Please clarify or rest your case. >> >>Ed >----------------- >Hi Ed, >You still got my vote for a well respected business man and humane person who i >also feel is very trustworthy. I also believe that some viewers here will have >a little doubt in the back of their minds, because some mud sticks to you like >the previous poster quoted, and it won't go away until the truth comes to the >surface! I was once quoted by grandfather that the "truth" will always rise >above the lies! > >Best Regards, >Terry Thanks Terry, those words can not be improved on by me. So, I echo them whole-heartedly Chris Taylor.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.