Author: Chris Taylor
Date: 04:22:58 12/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 09, 2000 at 05:53:46, Chessfun wrote: >On December 08, 2000 at 09:23:10, Chris Taylor wrote: > >>Please, may I ask why? Is it a personal thing, or chess based thing? >>I know a lot of hard work goes into opening books, and rightly so! When you >>spend as much time developing a chess program, I'm sure that a good book is a >>priority! >>After all a good start from the opening is a must...... >> >>If enough people say it is a bad idea, then I will drop it like......quickly! >>Got enough good chess programs to keep normal chess auto232 going, for a long >>time! >> >>Chris Taylor. > >Hi Chris, > What are you running now? did you decide on any of >the options, no book?, fischer? or nunn perhaps?. > >Sarah. Fischer is alright on paper, but I would not be able to get all the engines to sycronize on a fischer position. Same with the Nunn set. No book seems a strange idea, as a human playing the game, the idea seems unthinkable. Left with, join'em up and let'em play......And in saying that Century 3 is playing Shredder 5. Now this one is interesting. Chris Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.