Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Yet again: Hashing and FINE 70

Author: Tim Foden

Date: 06:39:19 12/18/00

Go up one level in this thread

On December 18, 2000 at 07:46:55, Ulrich Tuerke wrote:

>Forget my remarks. If this was your problem, you would probably not reach so
>high iterations. (Comet ususally solves this on iteration #18.)
>I guess that rather your algo has a bug.

I think you may well be right.  I could try stripping *everything* out of the
search and the evaluation function, except the hash table and material
evaluation.

Should the FINE 70 position still be solved with such a search?

>
>Sorry, Uli

No problem... any ideas are appreciated. :)

Cheers, Tim.

• Re: Yet again: Hashing and FINE 70 Miguel A. Ballicora 07:54:15 12/18/00
  • Re: Yet again: Hashing and FINE 70 Miguel A. Ballicora 10:06:46 12/18/00
• Re: Yet again: Hashing and FINE 70 Ulrich Tuerke 07:37:28 12/18/00
  • Re: Yet again: Hashing and FINE 70 Tim Foden 09:13:15 12/18/00
    • Re: Yet again: Hashing and FINE 70 Ulrich Tuerke 02:08:53 12/19/00
      • Re: Yet again: Hashing and FINE 70 Tim Foden 03:26:09 12/19/00
    • Re: Yet again: Hashing and FINE 70 Ulrich Tuerke 14:45:05 12/18/00
      • Re: Yet again: Hashing and FINE 70 Tim Foden 03:28:04 12/19/00

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.