Author: Laurence Chen
Date: 07:35:36 12/19/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 19, 2000 at 09:52:01, Josh Strayhorn wrote: > > >On December 19, 2000 at 08:46:23, Howard Exner wrote: > >>On December 19, 2000 at 08:15:56, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >> >>>On December 19, 2000 at 08:00:08, Laurence Chen wrote: >>> >>>>The drawish score is wrong. See (Enrique Irazoqui) Deep Fritz analysis after >>>>playing 1 ... Bg7!!. Black has a forced win. The key move is 4. ... Ned3! ( 1. >>>>... Bg7!!, 2. Ng1 Rxg3!, 3. Ne2 Rf3, 4. Ng1 Ned3!) which leads to a forced won >>>>endgame for Black. >>>>Regards, >>>>Laurence >>> >>>As Dan Andersson said, 4... c5+ is even better. That's the analysis of Deep >>>Fritz after 4.Ng1: >>> >>>New position >>>r5k1/ppp3bp/3p4/3Pn3/1n1KP1p1/1P3r2/PBB4R/R2Q2N1 b - - 0 1 >>> >*snip* >> >>But then Josh's idea of e5 ! first instead of Kc4 >>prolongs the game. I prefer your original analysis >>of omitting c5+ and just going with Ne3+. >> >>>b5+ 7.Kxb5 Rb8+ 8.Ka4 Nxb2+ 9.Ka3 Nxd1 10.Rxd1 >>> -+ (-2.16) Depth: 16/46 00:49:25 5737582kN >>> >>>(Irazoqui, Cadaqués 19.12.2000) > >Interesting. The line with Rxg3 is definitely an improvement. However, I think >White may still be able to hold this. > >I'm looking at the position after 26. ... Bg7 27. Ng1 Rxg3 28. Ne2 Rf3 29. Ng1 >c5+ 30. dxc6 Ned3+ ><snip> 29. ... Ned3+ is much better than 29. ... c5+ [D]r5k1/ppp4p/3p3b/3Pn3/1n1KP1p1/1P3rP1/PBB1N2R/R2Q4 w -- 0 30
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.