Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 09:30:37 12/19/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 19, 2000 at 11:37:42, Wayne Lowrance wrote:
>On December 19, 2000 at 09:59:18, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On December 19, 2000 at 07:55:02, Marcus Kaestner wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Gambittiger is leading the list but it is not clearly number 1.
>>>
>>>40 points after about 400 games is clear in my opinion.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Based on the list it is possible that Tiger13,chessmaster8000 or Shredder5 are
>>>>better.
>>>
>>>based on ANY list, anything is possible.
>>
>>Gambittiger's rating is between 2739-29 and 2739+29 based on the list and it
>>means that the lower bound is 2710.
>>
>>Not all the programs have an upper bound of less than 2710 but a lot of programs
>>have upper bound of more than 2710.
>>
>>Here is the list of programs that may be better than the lower bound of
>>gambittiger based on the list.
>>
>>1)Tiger13 2686-2745
>>2)Shredder5 2674-2734
>>3)Chessmaster8000 2571-2831
>>4)Rebel tigers 2588-2797(I do not know what is this program)
>>5)Chessmaster600 2522-2803
>>6)Century1.2 2503-2714
>>7)Kallisto2 2474-2721
>>8)Mchess8 2468-2712
>>9)Nimzo99 2363-2770
>>
>
>I thought they were one and the same, Are they saying they are not and one is
>better that the other. ? Christophe Please clarify ! The listing implies that
>Rebel Tiger is weaker ???
I guess that Rebel-Tiger is the version of last year. Rebel-Tiger had the Chess
Tiger 12 engine.
Rebel-Tiger II (the current version) has the Chess Tiger 13.0 and Gambit Tiger
1.0 engine.
I hope this clarifies.
Christophe
>Thanks
>WAyne
>
>>Fritz6(6a) has only 2672-2707 so the upper bound fails to be more than 2710.
>>
>>Other program also get almost an upper bound of 2710(Tiger11.9 2708,Gandalf4.32g
>>2705,Littlegoliath 2709).
>>
>>Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.