Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: ECM errata (201 thru 300)

Author: Amir Ban

Date: 03:40:46 01/25/98

Go up one level in this thread


On January 23, 1998 at 14:20:07, Howard Exner wrote:

>On January 22, 1998 at 18:51:06, Amir Ban wrote:
>
>>
>>Here's some more work for everybody:
>>
>>No. 206 (Nxc7):
>>
>>Looks incorrect: Nxc7 Qxc7 Qd5+ Kh8 Bxd6 and now white has a nasty
>>surpise with Nb6.
>>
>>Recommend: Throw it out.
>
>Try Re8, instead of Bxd6? ie Nf6 2.Rxf8 Bxf8 3.Bb2 Bg7 4.Bc4 ...
>>

Yes, very neat. Should be hard since 4.Bc4 is hard enough in itself.



>>
>>No. 231 (Rxd6):
>>
>>The point of the key is not obvious to me. I find Qh4+ which wins
>>material.
>>
>>Recommend: Change key to Qh4+. Check this out.
>
>1.Rxd6! Qxd6 2.Rd1 Qb8 3.Rxd7 1-0. This looks quicker than Qh4.
>

Perhaps, but why ? I still don't see it.


>>
>>
>>No. 237 (Bf2+):
>>
>>Junior's recommendation for black here is to resign. Bf2+ seems like a
>>particularly bad move. Anyone can say what the point is here ?
>>
>>Recommend: Throw it out.
>
>Rebel plays Rd1+ immediately with a big plus. This should be the key
>move.
>Involves a Knight under promotion.
>

I stand corrected. Junior does not consider underpromotions.


>>No. 274 (Qxf3+):
>>
>>One of those where the cook is prettier than the original. The idea is
>>the discovered check d4, but Qxf3+ is sloppy execution. Nd2! is right.
>>
>>Recommend: Change key to Nd2.
>
>Agree and also the simple Ng5 should transpose as white's reply, Nd4
>seems forced in both lines. Again, it is too easy.
>>

Agree. So Nd2, Ng5 are the solutions.


>>No. 287 (Qb5+):
>>
>>Looking at the position, the assignment "white wins" seems impossible. I
>>only see that Qb5+ draws, and so does Rc8+.
>>
>>Recommend: Investigation necessary.
>

I stand corrected.


>Both win after lots of forced checks and a Knight under promotion.
>The lines seemed forced for white and I think programs will stumble
>onto the win either initially or by accident rather quickly.
>>
>>


>>No. 300 (Kxd5):
>>
>>I find Bh2 Ke6 f5+ and this looks like a comfortable win. I don't see a
>>win after Kxd5 and it looks dubious.
>>
>>Recommend: Since Bh2 is trivial, throw it out.
>
>Yes it is easy but Kxd5 I think wins more quickly. The resulting N&pawns
>vs N&pawns ending is elementary. The other way still poses the problem
>of the two passed a pawns with the wrong colored bishop. It would still
>be an elementary win for strong humans. Computers would have to be
>careful
>not to lose the kingside pawns for a piece.

I don't find this ending elementary: 1.Kxd5 Nxg3 2.a6 Bb6 now if 3.a7
Bxa7 4.Nxa7 Ne2 and white gives back a pawn, or probably better is 3.a4
but not totally satisfactory. Who needs the aggravation when he can play
Bh2 ?

Amir



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.