Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Material vs Positional Assessments

Author: Ricardo Gibert

Date: 14:55:04 01/08/01

Go up one level in this thread


On January 08, 2001 at 08:12:25, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:

>On January 07, 2001 at 20:57:46, Ricardo Gibert wrote:
>
>>One well known rule of thumb is: It is often a bad idea to grab more material
>>when already ahead in material.
>>
>>For instance, when I play, I generally avoid increasing my material advantage
>>unless it does not cost me anything (time, structure, open lines for opponent,
>>etc.) to do so or I have nothing else to do that is constructive.
>>
>>In fact, a reasonable rule of thumb for open positions might be: The 1st pawn
>>grabbed is worth 3 tempi, but the 2nd pawn is only worth 1 tempo. Something I
>>observed while I studied some of Morphy's games.
>>
>>My question is: Do any programs take this into account or do they all consider
>>the 2nd pawn they grab to be as valuable as the 1st?
>
>why do you assume all programs are preprocessors?

I don't. Your interpretation is a complete surprise.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.