Author: Uri Blass
Date: 03:54:47 01/18/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 18, 2001 at 06:14:05, Harald Faber wrote: >On January 17, 2001 at 03:06:52, Uri Blass wrote: > >>> Actually I was very surprised at the SSDF result of rebel Century vs Fritz, My >>>Buddy and I played a 20 game match, I have a 750 using Century 3 and My Friend >>>has A Thunderbird 1000, the games were played manually , Century slaughtered >>>Fritz 13-7 !!! and he had the much faster hardware! Something is definitely >>>wrong with ssdf testing. >> >>I think it is still interesting to get the moves that cannot be reproduced >>manually in the ssdf games in order to prove the demage to Rebel. > > >You will often get some different moves in post-game analysis. This needn't to >be an auto232 problem. It is just different conditions. Even if you try to >replay the games manually starting at the end of the opening. The question is how often you will get it with no autoplayer problems if you use the same hardware and tries to simulate the same conditions(it means that you wait the time of the opponent before playing moves(the times are written in the pgn file)) I do not have time to do it. Another question is if there are tactical errors that cannot be reproduced. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.