Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Considering Frank's Poll...

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 14:39:41 01/18/01

Go up one level in this thread


On January 18, 2001 at 17:26:23, John Dahlem wrote:

>Speaking of these tournaments...
>
>Why don't they make all programs use equal hardware???? I don't understand why
>they allow anyone to use SIXTY 300 mhz processors, especially when some use one
>400 mhz processor. This in my opinion is very unfair! Hardware becomes the issue
>as much as software. Why dont they give all the authors a 1000 mhz pentium and
>say 'use this or dont play'?  I know there is an explanation but I obviously
>dont currently know what it is!

You are thinking of the WMCCC format.  This is not the microcomputer
championship.  It is simply the world championship.  If deep blue entered, there
would be no objections.

Uniform platform is very hard to achieve.  Give all the authors 1GHz PIII
machines?  What if your program is written for a Macintosh? [Yes, there really
are Mac programs, and they really have entered].  But uniform platform is a
laudable goal of sorts.  They strive for some parity in the WMCCC, but even that
is very difficult to achieve.

Consider also the cost of renting 40 PIII 1GHz machines for one week and the
insurance costs as well.  (If machines are provided, I think a lot more
programmers would show up!  Hauling a big PC all over the planet is a lot of
work and risky too).




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.