Author: Pete Galati
Date: 06:24:38 01/19/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 19, 2001 at 02:54:48, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >On January 18, 2001 at 23:03:46, Pete Galati wrote: > >>On January 18, 2001 at 22:21:05, leonid wrote: >> >>>On January 18, 2001 at 22:06:37, leonid wrote: >>> >>>>On January 18, 2001 at 19:13:22, Paul wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 18, 2001 at 19:01:08, Pete Galati wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On January 18, 2001 at 18:44:05, leonid wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Hi! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>If you would like to find a mate here is one position. It is very easy to solve >>>>>>>but not that simple to find shortest mate. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I failed here even in 3 hours to find shortest mate through brute force search. >>>>>>>Maybe you will have better chance. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1k4q1/1pppPr2/PbbP1N1n/QP2rn1R/1q6/1q2RBB1/q1q2PPP/6NK black to go >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Leonid. >>>>>> >>>>>>Is this the right position? >>>>>> >>>>>>[D]1k4q1/1pppPr2/PbbP1N1n/QP2rn1R/1q6/1q2RBB1/q1q2PPP/6NK b - - 0 1 >>>>> >>>>>If so, then mine says it's a mate in 10 for black starting with Nxg3+ ... >>>>>It looks like a daily reverse auction ... Anyone lower, anyone? :) >>>>> >>>>>Paul >>>> >>>>Position is exact and response 10 moves must be or shortest possible, or very >>>>close move. Actually my program solved this position through selective search in >>>>11 moves. Solution was instant. Finding shortest mate is the other story. >>>>Through brute force program said in 8 mate is not there. Only 9 still could be >>>>looked. >>> >>> >>>Mistake! My program solved this position not by 11 moves selective search but by >>>10. Found this when I went to program and solved this position once again. My >>>mistake came probably from the fact that I created today around 5 or 6 different >>>positions. Few of them were solved by 12 and 11 moves. Only one, that I liked >>>the most, I put here. >>> >>>Leonid. >> >>I thought for a minute that the Chessbase native version of Comet had done it in >>9 moves, but I was thinking, how could this be, but I took a closer look, and >>what Comet was calling 9 moves was 10 moves to everyone else. Oh well. > >Perhaps if Black had another queen(!), then he could mate in 9 ;-) Yeah, I'm not sure where these positions come from. Some of them are just too improbable/impossible, but for some reason sometime it's fun to have Chess programs crunch numbers, it's better than giving them bubble wrap to pop. Pete > >> >>1...Nxg3+ 2.hxg3 Rxh5+ 3.Nxh5 Qh4+ 4.gxh4 Qxg2+ 5.Bxg2 Bxg2+ 6.Kh2 Ng4+ 7.Kg3 >>Qxe3+ 8.fxe3 Qf2+ 9.Kxg4 Qe6+ 10.Kg5 Qff5# >> -+ (-#9) Depth: 8/37 00:12:17 187568kN >> >>(Galati, ` 18.01.2001) >> >>Pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.