Author: Severi Salminen
Date: 11:30:18 01/27/01
Hi! I made a few test games between a version of my engine using SEE and another using just MVV sorting. I played only a few (24) games and time control was 5min/G and in 8 games 1min/G. The result was 12-12! Is this possible, normal, or do I have a bug? I would have guessed that the SEE version had beat the hell out of the other but that never happened. It seems that SEE slows things down a lot and the net result seems to be that it searches equally deep compared to the other version. Has anyone here measured the true benefit of using SEE? Could you show me positions in which SEE makes a big difference or could you run self-test games between two versions of your program? Are there positions where SEE hurts searching? I really like to know if SEE is worth it? I have a relatively slow computer (300Mhz Celeron, Crafty running at 80KNPS) so could time control and overall speed have influence on this? Any comments are welcome! Severi
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.