Author: Tony Hedlund
Date: 11:39:13 01/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 2001 at 10:23:35, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On January 27, 2001 at 10:02:41, Uri Blass wrote: > >>Yes. >>I will give an extreme example. >> >>Suppose that you get in the ssdf list Fritz3(p90)-Fritz6(K6-2 450) 40-0 >> >>I think that in this case it is clear that something is wrong with the result. >> >>The 31.5-9.5 result is not so extreme and does not prove that something is wrong >>but you know that the probability that something is wrong is bigger relative to >>the case of 23-17 for deep fritz that is closer to the expected result of Rebel >>based on the ssdf rating(Deep Fritz does not have ssdf rating but we can guess >>based on other results that it is not clearly better than Fritz6). > >No, guessing doesn't work as an estimation or a valid hypothesis. It's your own >personal speculation and irrelevant in this case. As long as there's no expected >result except speculation, there's no "reasonable" result. Keep guessing if you >want, it isn't interesting at all. > >Mogens. Deep Fritz actually have a SSDF rating, but it's just we who no it. I can say so much that both the above results is equal probably. Tony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.