Author: Severi Salminen
Date: 04:26:33 02/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
>Getting a low branchingfactor takes time. ( A lot ) It's only usefull if you >search deep. Your 23s for 9 ply would suggest 82s for 10, 298s for 11 and 1073s >for ply 12. Twice as much as XiniX. Of course at short time controls this >advantage doesn't come out. ( So I don't play them ) If I use time to count EBF it is 2.9. So ply10=67s, ply11=193, ply12=560. So not twice as much, but you have a point. And maybe EBF is the reason why I got odd results: my SEEless version seemed equally strong as a version with SEE on fast time controls, but it was weaker at longer controls. So SEE and a low EBF pay off only at high depths. >My extensions don't really help to get me to 9 ply fast either. True, I have only check extensions. Severi
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.