Author: Tony Werten
Date: 16:08:38 02/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 02, 2001 at 12:10:58, James T. Walker wrote: >On February 02, 2001 at 03:19:14, Timothy J. Frohlick wrote: > >>On February 02, 2001 at 01:28:59, Jouni Uski wrote: >> >>>[D]8/6kn/3B3p/5K1B/8/8/8/8 b - - >>> >>>resign 1-0! Why? Is this really white's win? >>> >>>JouniDate: 1/2/2001 >> >>Jouni, >> >>Gambit Tiger without tablebases solves this as a mate in 46 in 26 minutes on a >>PII 333 with 48 Megs Hash. >> >>1... Ng5 2. Bc5 Nf7 3. Bd4+ Kf8 4. Kf6 Ng5 5. Bc5+ Kg8 6. Kf5 Nf7 7. Be7 Ng5 8. >>Bb4 Nf7 9. Kg6 Ne5+ 10. Kf6 Nd7+ 11. Ke7 Ne5 12. Bc3 Nc6+ 13. Ke8 Kh7 14. Kf7 >>Ne5+ 15. Kf6 Nc6 16. Bf3 Nd8 17. Bb4 h5 18. Be4+ Kh8 19. Be7 Nc6 20. Bxc6 Kh7 >>21. Be4+ Kg8 22. Kg6 Kh8 23. Bd5 h4 24. Bf6# >> >> >>1-0 >> >>Maybe tablebases are not all that great after all. They don't always find the >>shortest solution to a problem. >> >>Tim Frohlick > >Why mate in 46 and then you give a mate in 24 line? I believe the "mate in 46" >is true as Shredder 5 finds a mate in 47 (maybe a difference in terms) but where >did the above line which is 24 moves come from? Normally a move consists of 2 ply, but in this case the first and the last move are only 1 ply. So effectively 23 moves => 46 ply. 47 ply is impossible since black starts and white finishes so it has to be even. Tony >Jim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.