Author: David Rasmussen
Date: 16:04:45 02/09/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 09, 2001 at 10:39:09, Pat King wrote: >On February 07, 2001 at 10:59:31, Pat King wrote: > >>I have seen it written here that with 64 bit Zobrist hashing, the perfect key >>should change 32 bits. When I had what I thought to be hashing problems, I >>captured some stats on my hash keys. I found that most of them changed 28-36 >>bits (within 4) with a few outliers as far as 13 bits from "perfection". I also >>checked that I was not generating duplicate keys. How good or bad is this? >>Should I work on the average, or the outliers? Any comments appreciated :) >> >>Pat >Thanks to all for your thoughtful replies. For what it's worth, the only change >I've made is to generate a key set with hamming distance 31-33, with a >significant improvement in hash performance (thanks to Ricardo for providing a >reasonable argument to justify the 32 bit standard). I have yet to compare this >set with Rob's 16 bit criteria for XORing any 2 keys. > >Pat But 32 isn't optimal. As high as possible is optimal.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.