Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 11:46:20 02/19/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 2001 at 14:18:15, Leen Ammeraal wrote: >Yes, I know. That is why I had written "with pondering on" in my >question above. Okay, I misunderstood what you meant with implementing. >If other people use my program in a match >against others, the chances are that they will play with >pondering on, with a big disadvantage for my program because >it cannot ponder. I don't think that is the case in general. Most program testers know that you can't force a program to ponder that hasn't got pondering implemented, but that you can turn it off on those that has. This is one of the reasons I have for disabling ponder in my own tests. >So I am afraid, I cannot afford NOT implementing >pondering, only so far I don't have a clue how to begin. >Any help would be very welcome. I'm afraid I can't help you with that particular question. Mogens.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.