Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 12:27:35 03/06/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 06, 2001 at 14:50:03, Fernando Villegas wrote: >Hi: >You are right that is not convincing enough in scientific terms, but it never >tried to be more than a opinion, I think grounded, but opinion after all. BTW, I >did play the same opennings with every version, but besides that, even with >different opennings, you can more or less feel the degree of agresiveness a >program has according the kind of moves he choose between the pool of acceptable >moves. In this sense H seems to me more interesting. I am sure that you can >feel, for instance, the different style between, say, Genius 5 and CSTAl no >matter what openning you play. This is, of course, a very extreme example, but >makes the point... until a degree. If we are talking about impressions then I don't think there is really anything to argue about. In fact, I can form an impression from just looking at the box. ;-) Since an impression is nothing more than a viewpoint it is neither right nor wrong. It is an impression.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.