Author: Uri Blass
Date: 03:48:03 03/15/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 15, 2001 at 06:35:19, Dan Andersson wrote: >I checked out crafty in this position and it doesn't have a clue. In general I >think crafty is bad in the opening phase its real strenght lies in the smooth >transitions between opening/middlegame and middlegame/endgame as I seldom >observe huge differences in evaluation there. IMO it is very conservative in its >design and evaluation. I see it as the new Tech program, and any truly great >program will have to beat it convincingly i.e take twice as many points in a >long match. > >Regards Dan Andersson I did not analyze this position but the way to prove that Crafty does not have a clue is to prove that it is losing in both sides against you or against other programs. I do not trust evaluations of humans for moves of computers because humans may be wrong to believe that a move is illogical because of things that they do not see. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.