Author: Steven Schwartz
Date: 07:35:25 03/22/98
Go up one level in this thread
On March 22, 1998 at 06:52:56, Robert Sullivan wrote: >Thanks for the reply, Steve. What kind of issues discussed here on CCC >would lend themselves to a voting format? If Bob Hyatt tells Howard or >Ed that reiterative subduction of n-therblig nanobytes produces errant >pawn moves, I'm not sure I would know how I'd vote on that question. >Although I think I might be opposed, I'm not certain. Anyway, are you >suggesting questions like, "Should SSDF standardize their testing >procedures?" If so, it might be interesting, and probably entail more >work for you and the webmaster. >Best regards as always, >Robert If we allow questions like the first one (reiterative subduction...) ever come up, I will recommend that we have, in addition to "yes", "no", and "abstain" selections, a choice called "heh???". My thought was that only issues that affected a large percentage of readers would be covered. -Steve
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.