Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: SSDF Not Important ??

Author: Scott Carmichael

Date: 10:44:59 03/23/98


   In an earlier post here, someone stated that they believed that
computer chess will go on long after the SSDF has fallen into the dust.
While this statement may be true (it is for me as well, so don't get
upset), I truly believe that if and when the SSDF falls, there will be a
replacement either already in existence, or following shortly after the
demise of the aforementioned group.
   Why you might ask ? Because we that are truly interested in the
development and progress that has/is being made by the people who create
and develop such software are truly interested in having a non-biased
evaluation of these programs readily available to us. Perhaps these
programmers can join together and agree on such a consortium?
   While my idea may be a bit naive considering the fact that the SSDF
rates COMMERCIAL software (and, ergo, there is a financial involvement
on the behalf of the software teams), I believe that the majority of we
buyers should be able to have some say in these matters.
Perhaps we can work together to solve this problem in a manner
satisfactory to all involved !?
   Any suggestions ??



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.