Author: Pete Galati
Date: 14:26:58 03/29/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 29, 2001 at 14:27:53, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On March 29, 2001 at 13:54:25, Fabio Lopez wrote: > >>>He was simply pointing out that these posts generally lead to long discussions >>>that prove _nothing_ since Deep Blue is not currently available to play games >>>anywhere. >> >>Deep Blue is not available so we shouldn't feature it in any discussion? >>I don't see any logic there. Following your logic, perhaps we should keep our >>discussions restricted to Crafty and Tiger then, as they're available. > > >It depends on _how_ the discussion starts. If someone asks "Can someone >explain how DB used 480 chess processors?" then that discussion is of general >interest and will be interesting. That would be a good thread in my opinion, I doubt that I'd have the tech savvy to participate, but I'd read a lot of it if someone starts a thread that way. Chinook however has next to no interest to me though, and personally, I'm not concerned if it's retired or not, but that's just me. Pete >If someone asks "Why is DB hiding?" that >is more inflammatory and will cause long flaming threads...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.