Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: SSDF Not Important ??

Author: Scott Carmichael

Date: 15:07:18 03/24/98

Go up one level in this thread


   The point is not to kill off the SSDF, but  to recognize the fact
that in some form or another, people will still continue to produce the
same type of results for those who are interested.
   The whole group of testers at SSDF are volunteers, and I don't think
that they will all quit performing a lobor of love as long as others are
willing to provide the software, and as long as people take a keen
interest in the facts they establish.
   If it means that I or others like me have to step in and try to keep
this alive, don't doubt for a second that it will occur. Maybe not in
the exact same format, or maybe only expanding on an existing format,
but nonetheless, it will still go on.
If you are asking if I want to establish a new group, then the answer is
certainly not. But should the existing establishments fail, then by all
means I am willing to donate my time to persue this.
   Will you do the same Bruce, or will you just sit back and read about
it in the posts?



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.