Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 13:09:40 04/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 04, 2001 at 15:25:01, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >Hi Vincent, > >yes, in some way the gambit tiger seems to polarize the feelings of the users. >If they are not bloodily annoyed, then they are incredibly happy. > >The programmers know that even Chris is using just water to boil his coffee. > >Nevertheless, it's certainly an interesting program and I'm looking forward >trying it. But I doubt that it's so totally different than the others. > >I am sure that even Diep has some 2nd order evaluation terms, right ? > >Greetings, Uli I would categorize mine as 3rd order in terms of king safety. Pawn structure around the king is first order for me. The pieces that join the attack get their score modified by this pawn structure evaluation. And then all the pieces influence each other's score in a big third-order term. Seems perfectly normal to me to do it that way. Been doing it like that for years.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.