Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: tiger's play too risky ?

Author: Thomas Lagershausen

Date: 10:58:54 04/06/01

Go up one level in this thread


Hallo Ulrich,
first reason is off course B32 is not so weak.I think you agree.
Second is the opinings are resulting in very tough positions with very unclear
positions in which everything could happen.Look at this variations in humanchess
and you can find victories from weaker players over stronger players.When you
wan´t to win against a stronger opponent you have to choose unclear positions
and your chances are rising.First game i would say after the opening change
sides and you will see comet also loosing the black position.It´s not so funny
to play with black this position. I am pretty shure.Programs came slowly in this
area where it is sufficient to have ELO 2500 to win a position against a ELO
2650 opponent if the position is the reason for the win.There are a lot of
positions that are far too complicated that you have everything under
control.Believe me.That´s the experience of a chessmaster of an not so small
city.
Greetings Thomas



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.