Author: Ralf Elvsén
Date: 08:08:44 04/10/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 09, 2001 at 15:20:08, Bertil Eklund wrote: >On April 09, 2001 at 13:53:02, John Smith wrote: > >>Under the about taskbar icon, credit is given to Richard Lang. I'm not sure >>where the gentleman in a previous post came up with the "cracked by..." >>information. >> >>Very strong prog. Stronger than my Nimzo 732 or Hiarcs 732 in preliminary >>testing. Primitive GUI coupled with tiny hash table, give it a retro look. >> >>But it is strong. > >Hi! > >You can use 32mb hashtables, not to bad. It can compete rather well in blitz but >in 2h/40 it is another story. > >Bertil In the first game I played against it it gave away a pawn for nothing in a dead drawn pawn endgame, so I won easily. "What a piece of junk" I thought. Then I lost five games in a row... Is it weak in endgames? Otherwise I thought it had an "elegant" style. Hard to put the finger on, but it was very fun to play. Ralf
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.