Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Regarding the Kramnik match: is CCC so deeply asleep??? :) :)

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 10:15:29 04/19/01

Go up one level in this thread


On April 19, 2001 at 11:48:08, Christophe Theron wrote:

>Hi CCC!
>
>
>
>Life is so fun!
>
>I had a great time today reading the comments of Stefan and all the answers
>(yesterday was No Computer Day for me, so I did not read the forum).
>
>What do I read? I read that one of the main reasons to withdraw from the Kramnik
>challenge (not the only one to be honnest) is the fact that the program must be
>sent to the player three months before the match.
>
>Wow! So the player is going to prepare for three months, and because of this
>even a player weaker than Kramnik would be able to crush the computer.
>
>Ach so!
>
>And EVERYBODY is following up by comments like:
>
>X: this is unacceptable.
>
> Y: yes, this match is a joke.
>
>  Z: of course, everything has been done so Kramnik will win easily.
>
>   X (again): I told you! Of course Stefan HAD to withdraw after this.
>
>    Y: yes, this condition is an insult!
>
>     W: of course, now we know who has killed JFK.
>
>
>
>:) :) :)
>
>That's incredible. Everybody is jumping into the trap without even THINKING.
>
>
>How should I call that? Disinformation, Lack of information, Deep Sleep,
>Collective Hypnosis?
>
>OK, let's go for LACK OF IMAGINATION.
>
>
>Guys, we are faced with a PROBLEM: the player will have access to the program 3
>months before the match.
>
>So let's find a SOLUTION!
>
>I won't go into Deep Details here, but let me tell you that I can easily write a
>program that nobody could ever prepare against, especially given the (known)
>conditions of the match.
>
>You do not have to be a chess programmer to know how to do that.
>
>
>OK, let's see if somebody can come up with a decent solution to this problem.
>Please, show me that you are not all deeply asleep and try to find creative
>solution(s). There are actually many ways to solve the problem.

It is easy but it seems like cheating and this is the reason that I did not
suggest it.

I thought about 2 ways:

Way 1:The program ask kramnik for a passward and tells him that it is going to
play well only if he clicks the right passward.

The right passward is known only to the programmer.

Way 2:The program comes with a lot of parameters.
Before playing the program ask kramnik to give the parameters numbers.
The name of the parameters are not significant names so kramnik will have a big
problem to guess the right parameters

Kramnik is not going to know that the parameter with the name raveowc means the
value of the queen in pawns and not the value of the knight.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.