Author: José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba
Date: 04:50:01 04/20/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 20, 2001 at 07:27:56, José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba wrote: >On April 19, 2001 at 17:15:33, Uri Blass wrote: > >> >>I think that it will be more interesting for the public to see the following: >> >>first Match between kramnik and the program: >>Kramnik has no knowledge about the opponent and he even does not know the name >>of the program and can only guess. >> >>If kramnik is losing kramnik has 3 monthes to prepare to the second match: >>Second match:Kramnik can get games of the opponent against other programs and >>also the name of the opponent but cannot get the opponent. >> >>If kramnik is losing the second match kramnik gets the opponent and has 3 >>monthes to prepare to the third match. >> >>The opponent should play in the same way in every day and tricks like changing >>the playing style in different date are not allowed(in the same way does not >>mean that it is going to play the same moves because there can be some >>randomness and it is known that programs with more than 1 processor are not >>deterministic but the randomness must be the same kind of randomness in all >>days. >> >>Uri > >I would love to see that: "Kramnik vs the masked computer"! I do not like all >your conditions for the rematches, but for the first match I am in full >agreement. >José. And the operator should show up masked for the games, in order not to give Kramnik any clue! José.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.