Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 06:13:09 05/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 04, 2001 at 08:41:47, Tony Hedlund wrote: >I agree, I don't think Bertil was part of the decision process. And then your >assumption, and problem, falls. Not entirely. Either a purely recommendational role or as a justification for Enrigue's decisions (if he made any, which Schröder implies if I understand correctly) poses the same problem. Only the level of involvement or free will differs. >About making a decision based on the list. My >problem, however, is what limitations the list have which disqualify Bertil as >an expert? Apart from having virtually no information about SMP programs and the lack of completeness? That would seem like considerable obstacles given the BGN parameters for selecting relevant candidates IMHO. Don't you agree? Mogens.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.